TUKYSA® Clinical Studies

(tucatinib)

14 CLINICAL STUDIES

14.1 HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

The efficacy of TUKYSA in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine was evaluated in 612 patients in HER2CLIMB (NCT02614794), a randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were required to have HER2-positive, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, with or without brain metastases, and prior treatment with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) separately or in combination, in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. HER2 positivity was based on archival or fresh tissue tested with an FDA-approved test at a central laboratory prior to enrollment with HER2 positivity defined as HER2 IHC 3+ or ISH positive.

Patients with brain metastases, including those with progressing or untreated lesions, were eligible provided they were neurologically stable and did not require immediate radiation or surgery. The trial excluded patients with leptomeningeal disease.  Randomization was stratified by the presence or history of brain metastases (yes vs. no), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 vs. 1), and region (U.S., Canada, or rest of world).

Patients received TUKYSA 300 mg or placebo orally twice daily with a trastuzumab or a non-US approved trastuzumab product loading dose of 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of Cycle 1 if needed and then a maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle thereafter and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on Days 1 through 14 of every 21-day cycle. An alternate trastuzumab dosing regimen was 600 mg administered subcutaneously on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle.  Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor assessments, including brain-MRI in patients with presence or history of brain metastases at baseline, occurred every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks and every 9 weeks thereafter.

The major efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS) in the first 480 randomized patients assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Additional efficacy outcome measures were evaluated in all randomized patients and included overall survival (OS), PFS among patients with a history or presence of brain metastases (PFSBrainMets), and confirmed objective response rate (ORR).

The median age was 54 years (range: 22 - 82); 116 (19%) patients were age 65 or older. The majority were White (73%) and female (99%) and 51% had an ECOG performance status of 1. Sixty percent had estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive disease. Forty-eight percent had a presence or history of brain metastases; of these patients, 23% had untreated brain metastases, 40% had treated but stable brain metastases, and 37% had treated but radiographically progressing brain metastases. Seventy-four percent of patients had visceral metastases. Patients had received a median of 4 (range, 2 to 17) prior lines of systemic therapy and a median of 3 (range, 1 to 14) prior lines of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting. All patients received prior trastuzumab and T-DM1 and all but two patients had prior pertuzumab.

Efficacy results are summarized in Table 12 and Figure 1 and 2. Efficacy results were consistent across patient subgroups defined by stratification factors (presence or history of brain metastases, ECOG status, region of world) and hormone receptor status.

Table 12: Efficacy Results in HER2CLIMB
BICR=blinded independent central review; CI=confidence interval; PFS=progression-free survival; OS=overall survival; ORR=objective response rate; CR=complete response; PR=partial response; DOR=duration of response.
1.     Primary PFS analysis conducted in first 480 randomized patients.
2.     Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals are based on stratified Cox proportional
        hazards regression model controlling for stratification factors (presence or history of brain
        metastases, ECOG status, and region of world)
3.     Two-sided p-value based on re-randomization procedure (Rosenberger and Lachin
         2002) controlling for stratification factors, compared with the allocated alpha of 0.05
4.      Two-sided p-value based on re-randomization procedure (Rosenberger and Lachin 2002)
         controlling for stratification factors, compared with the allocated alpha of 0.0074 for this
         interim analysis (with 60% of the planned number of events for final analysis) 
5.      Analysis includes patients with history or presence of parenchymal brain metastases at
         baseline, including target and non-target lesions. Does not include patients with dural
         lesions only. 
6.      Two-sided p-value based on re-randomization procedure (Rosenberger and Lachin 2002)
          controlling for stratification factors, compared with the allocated alpha of 0.0080 for this
          interim analysis (with 71% of the planned number of events for final analysis) 
7.      Two-sided 95% exact confidence interval, computed using the Clopper-Pearson method (1934)
8.      Calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method (Collett, 1994) 
 TUKYSA + Trastuzumab + 
Capecitabine
Placebo + Trastuzumab + 
Capecitabine
PFS1N=320N=160
    Number of events (%) 178 (56) 97 (61)
    Median, months (95% CI) 7.8 (7.5, 9.6) 5.6 (4.2, 7.1)
     Hazard ratio (95% CI)2 0.54 (0.42, 0.71)
     P-value3 <0.00001
OSN=410N=202
     Number of deaths (%) 130 (32) 85 (42)
     Median, months (95% CI) 21.9 (18.3, 31.0) 17.4 (13.6, 19.9)
     Hazard ratio (95% CI)2 0.66 (0.50, 0.87)
     P-value4 0.00480
PFSBrainMets5N=198N=93
     Number of events (%) 106 (53.5) 51 (54.8)
     Median, months (95% CI) 7.6 (6.2, 9.5) 5.4 (4.1, 5.7)
     Hazard ratio (95% CI)2 0.48 (0.34, 0.69)
P-value6 <0.00001
Confirmed ORR for Patients with Measurable DiseaseN=340N=171
     ORR (95% CI)7 40.6 (35.3, 46.0) 22.8 (16.7, 29.8)
     CR (%) 3 (0.9) 2 (1.2)
     PR (%) 135 (39.7) 37 (21.6)
     P-value3 0.00008
DOR
     Median, months (95% CI)8 8.3 (6.2, 9.7) 6.3 (5.8, 8.9)
figure 1
figure 2

14.2 HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The efficacy of TUKYSA in combination with trastuzumab was evaluated in 84 patients in MOUNTAINEER (NCT03043313), an open-label, multicenter trial. Patients were required to have HER2-positive, RAS wild-type, unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer and prior treatment with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody (mAb). Patients whose disease had deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) proteins or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) must have also received an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) mAb. Patients who received prior anti-HER2 targeting therapy were excluded. HER2 positivity as defined by HER2 overexpression or gene amplification was prospectively determined in local laboratories using immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) on tumor tissue. RAS status was performed as standard of care prior to study entry based on expanded RAS testing including KRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 and NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4.

The median age was 55 years (range: 24 to 77); 12 (14%) patients were age 65 or older. Seventy-seven percent of patients were White, 4% were Black, 4% were Asian, and 4% were Hispanic or Latino. Sixty-one percent of patients were male. Seventy percent of patients had lung metastases, 64% had liver metastases, 60% had an ECOG performance status of 0, 37% had an ECOG performance status of 1, and 4% had an ECOG performance status of 2. Ninety-nine percent of patients received prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan and 83% and 52% received anti-VEGF antibodies and anti-EGFR antibodies respectively; 23%, 38%, and 39% received 1, 2, or ≥3 prior lines of therapy, respectively.

Patients received TUKYSA 300 mg orally twice per day with a loading dose of trastuzumab or a non-US approved trastuzumab product 8 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by a maintenance dose of trastuzumab 6 mg/kg on Day 1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The major efficacy outcome measures were overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) according to RECIST version 1.1.

Efficacy results are summarized in Table 13.

Table 13: Efficacy Results in MOUNTAINEER
1. Based on Kaplan-Meier method.
2. Based on observed duration of response.

TUKYSA + trastuzumab
N=84
Overall Response Rate (%) (95% CI) 38 (28, 49)
CR (%) 3 (3.6)
PR (%) 29 (35)
Duration of Response N=32
Median1 , months (95% CI) 12.4 (8.5, 20.5)
Patients with DOR≥6 months2 81%
Patients with DOR≥12 months2 34%

Find TUKYSA®  medical information:

Find TUKYSA® medical information:

Our scientific content is evidence-based, scientifically balanced and non-promotional. It undergoes rigorous internal medical review and is updated regularly to reflect new information.

TUKYSA® Quick Finder

Prescribing Information
Download Prescribing Information

Health Professional Information

Clinical Studies

14 CLINICAL STUDIES

14.1 HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

The efficacy of TUKYSA in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine was evaluated in 612 patients in HER2CLIMB (NCT02614794), a randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were required to have HER2-positive, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, with or without brain metastases, and prior treatment with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) separately or in combination, in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. HER2 positivity was based on archival or fresh tissue tested with an FDA-approved test at a central laboratory prior to enrollment with HER2 positivity defined as HER2 IHC 3+ or ISH positive.

Patients with brain metastases, including those with progressing or untreated lesions, were eligible provided they were neurologically stable and did not require immediate radiation or surgery. The trial excluded patients with leptomeningeal disease.  Randomization was stratified by the presence or history of brain metastases (yes vs. no), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 vs. 1), and region (U.S., Canada, or rest of world).

Patients received TUKYSA 300 mg or placebo orally twice daily with a trastuzumab or a non-US approved trastuzumab product loading dose of 8 mg/kg on Day 1 of Cycle 1 if needed and then a maintenance dose of 6 mg/kg on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle thereafter and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on Days 1 through 14 of every 21-day cycle. An alternate trastuzumab dosing regimen was 600 mg administered subcutaneously on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle.  Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor assessments, including brain-MRI in patients with presence or history of brain metastases at baseline, occurred every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks and every 9 weeks thereafter.

The major efficacy outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS) in the first 480 randomized patients assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Additional efficacy outcome measures were evaluated in all randomized patients and included overall survival (OS), PFS among patients with a history or presence of brain metastases (PFSBrainMets), and confirmed objective response rate (ORR).

The median age was 54 years (range: 22 - 82); 116 (19%) patients were age 65 or older. The majority were White (73%) and female (99%) and 51% had an ECOG performance status of 1. Sixty percent had estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive disease. Forty-eight percent had a presence or history of brain metastases; of these patients, 23% had untreated brain metastases, 40% had treated but stable brain metastases, and 37% had treated but radiographically progressing brain metastases. Seventy-four percent of patients had visceral metastases. Patients had received a median of 4 (range, 2 to 17) prior lines of systemic therapy and a median of 3 (range, 1 to 14) prior lines of systemic therapy in the metastatic setting. All patients received prior trastuzumab and T-DM1 and all but two patients had prior pertuzumab.

Efficacy results are summarized in Table 12 and Figure 1 and 2. Efficacy results were consistent across patient subgroups defined by stratification factors (presence or history of brain metastases, ECOG status, region of world) and hormone receptor status.

Table 12: Efficacy Results in HER2CLIMB
BICR=blinded independent central review; CI=confidence interval; PFS=progression-free survival; OS=overall survival; ORR=objective response rate; CR=complete response; PR=partial response; DOR=duration of response.
1.     Primary PFS analysis conducted in first 480 randomized patients.
2.     Hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals are based on stratified Cox proportional
        hazards regression model controlling for stratification factors (presence or history of brain
        metastases, ECOG status, and region of world)
3.     Two-sided p-value based on re-randomization procedure (Rosenberger and Lachin
         2002) controlling for stratification factors, compared with the allocated alpha of 0.05
4.      Two-sided p-value based on re-randomization procedure (Rosenberger and Lachin 2002)
         controlling for stratification factors, compared with the allocated alpha of 0.0074 for this
         interim analysis (with 60% of the planned number of events for final analysis) 
5.      Analysis includes patients with history or presence of parenchymal brain metastases at
         baseline, including target and non-target lesions. Does not include patients with dural
         lesions only. 
6.      Two-sided p-value based on re-randomization procedure (Rosenberger and Lachin 2002)
          controlling for stratification factors, compared with the allocated alpha of 0.0080 for this
          interim analysis (with 71% of the planned number of events for final analysis) 
7.      Two-sided 95% exact confidence interval, computed using the Clopper-Pearson method (1934)
8.      Calculated using the complementary log-log transformation method (Collett, 1994) 
 TUKYSA + Trastuzumab + 
Capecitabine
Placebo + Trastuzumab + 
Capecitabine
PFS1N=320N=160
    Number of events (%) 178 (56) 97 (61)
    Median, months (95% CI) 7.8 (7.5, 9.6) 5.6 (4.2, 7.1)
     Hazard ratio (95% CI)2 0.54 (0.42, 0.71)
     P-value3 <0.00001
OSN=410N=202
     Number of deaths (%) 130 (32) 85 (42)
     Median, months (95% CI) 21.9 (18.3, 31.0) 17.4 (13.6, 19.9)
     Hazard ratio (95% CI)2 0.66 (0.50, 0.87)
     P-value4 0.00480
PFSBrainMets5N=198N=93
     Number of events (%) 106 (53.5) 51 (54.8)
     Median, months (95% CI) 7.6 (6.2, 9.5) 5.4 (4.1, 5.7)
     Hazard ratio (95% CI)2 0.48 (0.34, 0.69)
P-value6 <0.00001
Confirmed ORR for Patients with Measurable DiseaseN=340N=171
     ORR (95% CI)7 40.6 (35.3, 46.0) 22.8 (16.7, 29.8)
     CR (%) 3 (0.9) 2 (1.2)
     PR (%) 135 (39.7) 37 (21.6)
     P-value3 0.00008
DOR
     Median, months (95% CI)8 8.3 (6.2, 9.7) 6.3 (5.8, 8.9)
figure 1
figure 2

14.2 HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The efficacy of TUKYSA in combination with trastuzumab was evaluated in 84 patients in MOUNTAINEER (NCT03043313), an open-label, multicenter trial. Patients were required to have HER2-positive, RAS wild-type, unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer and prior treatment with fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody (mAb). Patients whose disease had deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) proteins or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) must have also received an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) mAb. Patients who received prior anti-HER2 targeting therapy were excluded. HER2 positivity as defined by HER2 overexpression or gene amplification was prospectively determined in local laboratories using immunohistochemistry (IHC), in situ hybridization (ISH), and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) on tumor tissue. RAS status was performed as standard of care prior to study entry based on expanded RAS testing including KRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 and NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4.

The median age was 55 years (range: 24 to 77); 12 (14%) patients were age 65 or older. Seventy-seven percent of patients were White, 4% were Black, 4% were Asian, and 4% were Hispanic or Latino. Sixty-one percent of patients were male. Seventy percent of patients had lung metastases, 64% had liver metastases, 60% had an ECOG performance status of 0, 37% had an ECOG performance status of 1, and 4% had an ECOG performance status of 2. Ninety-nine percent of patients received prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan and 83% and 52% received anti-VEGF antibodies and anti-EGFR antibodies respectively; 23%, 38%, and 39% received 1, 2, or ≥3 prior lines of therapy, respectively.

Patients received TUKYSA 300 mg orally twice per day with a loading dose of trastuzumab or a non-US approved trastuzumab product 8 mg/kg intravenously on Day 1 of Cycle 1, followed by a maintenance dose of trastuzumab 6 mg/kg on Day 1 of each subsequent 21-day cycle. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The major efficacy outcome measures were overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) according to RECIST version 1.1.

Efficacy results are summarized in Table 13.

Table 13: Efficacy Results in MOUNTAINEER
1. Based on Kaplan-Meier method.
2. Based on observed duration of response.

TUKYSA + trastuzumab
N=84
Overall Response Rate (%) (95% CI) 38 (28, 49)
CR (%) 3 (3.6)
PR (%) 29 (35)
Duration of Response N=32
Median1 , months (95% CI) 12.4 (8.5, 20.5)
Patients with DOR≥6 months2 81%
Patients with DOR≥12 months2 34%
Medication Guide

Health Professional Information

{{section_name_patient}}

{{section_body_html_patient}}

Resources

Didn’t find what you were looking for? Contact us.

MI Digital Assistant

Chat online with Pfizer Medical Information regarding your inquiry on a Pfizer medicine.

Call 800-438-1985*

*Speak with a Pfizer Medical Information Professional regarding your medical inquiry. Available 9AM-5PM ET Monday to Friday; excluding holidays.

Medical Inquiry

Submit a medical question for Pfizer prescription products.

Report Adverse Event

Pfizer Safety

To report an adverse event related to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and you are not part of a clinical trial* for this product, click the link below to submit your information:

Pfizer Safety Reporting Site

*If you are involved in a clinical trial for this product, adverse events should be reported to your coordinating study site.

If you cannot use the above website, or would like to report an adverse event related to a different Pfizer product, please call Pfizer Safety at (800) 438-1985.

FDA Medwatch

You may also contact the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) directly to report adverse events or product quality concerns either online at www.fda.gov/medwatch or call (800) 822-7967.