XYNTHA® Lyophilized Powder Clinical Studies

(antihemophilic factor [Recombinant])

14 CLINICAL STUDIES

Three completed multicenter, open-label studies support the analysis of safety and efficacy of XYNTHA in on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes and perioperative management, and routine prophylaxis in PTPs with hemophilia A. These completed clinical studies for XYNTHA examined 174 PTP subjects, 94 from the first study, and 50 from a second study, for on-demand treatment and routine prophylaxis and 30 from a third study for surgical prophylaxis. Subjects with severe to moderately severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C ≤2%) and no history of FVIII inhibitors were eligible for the trials.

On-demand Treatment and Control of Bleeding Episodes

On-demand treatment in adolescents and adults

Ninety-four (94) subjects, 12 years of age and older received XYNTHA in a routine prophylaxis treatment regimen with on-demand treatment administered as clinically indicated. All 94 subjects were treated with at least one dose and all are included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Eighty-nine (89) subjects accrued ≥50 EDs. Median age for the 94 treated subjects was 24 years (mean 28 and min-max: 12–60 years).

Of these 94 subjects, 30 evaluable subjects participated in a randomized crossover pharmacokinetics substudy. Twenty-five (25/30) of these subjects with FVIII:C ≤1% completed both the first (PK1) and the second (PK2) pharmacokinetic assessments [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].16

Fifty-three subjects (53/94) received XYNTHA on-demand treatment for a total of 187 bleeding episodes. Seven of these bleeding episodes occurred in subjects prior to switching to a prophylaxis treatment regimen. One hundred ten of 180 bleeds (110/180 or 61%) occurred ≤48 hours after the last dose and 39% (70/180 bleeds) occurred >48 hours after the last dose. The majority of bleeds reported to occur ≤48 hours after the last prophylaxis dose were traumatic (64/110 bleeds or 58%). Forty-two bleeds (42/70 or 60%) reported to occur >48 hours after the last prophylaxis dose were spontaneous. The on-demand treatment dosing regimen was determined by the investigator. The median dose for on-demand treatment was 31 IU/kg (min-max: 6–74 IU/kg) and the median exposure per subject was 3 days (min-max: 1–26).

The majority of bleeding episodes (173/187 or 93%) resolved with 1 or 2 infusions (Table 5). One hundred thirty-two of 187 bleeding episodes (132/187 or 71%) treated with XYNTHA were rated excellent or good in their response to initial treatment, 45 (24%) were rated moderate. Five (3%) were rated no response, and 5 (3%) were not rated.

Table 5: Summary of Response to Infusions to Treat New Bleeding Episode by Number of Infusions Needed for Resolution
Response to 1st InfusionNumber of Infusions
(%)
1
Number of Infusions
(%)
2
Number of Infusions
(%)
3
Number of Infusions
(%)
4
Number of Infusions
(%)
>4
Total Number of Bleeds
*
Excellent: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding starting within 8 hours after an infusion, with no additional infusion administered.
Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding starting within 8 hours after an infusion, with at least one additional infusion administered for complete resolution of the bleeding episode.
Moderate: Probable or slight improvement starting after 8 hours following the infusion, with at least one additional infusion administered for complete resolution of the bleeding episode.
§
No Response: No improvement at all between infusions or during the 24 hour interval following an infusion, or condition worsens.
Includes one infusion with commercial FVIII that occurred before routine prophylaxis began.
Excellent*42 (95.5)2 (4.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)44
Good69 (78.4)16 (18.2)3 (3.4)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)88
Moderate24 (53.3)16 (35.6)2 (4.4)0 (0.0)3 (6.7)45
No Response§0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (40.0)2 (40.0)1 (20.0)5
Not Assessed4 (80.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (20.0)0 (0.0)5
Total139 (74.3)34 (18.2)7 (3.7)3 (1.6)4 (2.1)187

Of the 94 subjects described above, in the first completed open-label safety and efficacy study of XYNTHA, 18 were adolescent subjects 12 to <17 years of age with severe to moderately severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C ≤2%). Ten (10) of these adolescent subjects, received XYNTHA for the on-demand treatment of 66 bleeding episodes, with the majority of the bleeding episodes (63/66 or 95%) resolving with 1 or 2 infusions. The response to infusion was rated on a pre-specified 4 point hemostatic efficacy scale. Thirty-eight (38) of 66 bleeding episodes (58%) were rated excellent or good in their response to initial treatment, 24 (36%) were rated as moderate, and 4 (6%) were not rated. The median dose per on demand infusion was 47 IU/kg (min-max: 24–74).

On-demand treatment in children

Additional data for 50 subjects are available from a second safety and efficacy study of XYNTHA in children (≤12 years of age) with severe to moderately severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C ≤2%). Of the 50 subjects, 38 subjects received XYNTHA for on-demand and follow-up treatment of 562 bleeding episodes with the majority of the bleeding episodes (518/562 or 92%) resolving with 1 or 2 infusions. Of 559 bleeding episodes treated with XYNTHA with response assessments to the first infusion, 526 (94%) were rated excellent or good in their response to initial treatment and 27 (5%) were rated as moderate. The median dose per on-demand infusion was 28 IU/kg (min-max: 10–92).

Perioperative Management

In a study (n=30) for surgical prophylaxis in subjects with hemophilia A, XYNTHA was administered to 25 efficacy-evaluable PTPs undergoing major surgical procedures (11 total knee replacements, 1 hip replacement, 5 synovectomies, 1 left ulnar nerve transposition release, 1 ventral hernia repair/scar revision, 1 knee arthroscopy, 1 revision and debridement of the knee after a total knee replacement, 1 hip arthroplasty revision, 1 stapes replacement, 1 ankle arthrodesis, and 1 pseudotumor excision).17

The results of the hemostatic efficacy ratings for these subjects are presented in Table 6. Investigator's ratings of efficacy at the end of surgery and at the end of the initial postoperative period were excellent or good for all assessments. Intraoperative blood loss was reported as "normal" or "absent" for all subjects. Thirteen of the subjects (13/25 or 52%) had blood loss in the postoperative period. The postoperative blood loss was rated as "normal" for ten of these cases while three cases were rated "abnormal" (1 due to hemorrhage following surgical trauma to the epigastric artery, 1 due to an 800 mL blood loss after hip replacement surgery, and 1 after an elbow synovectomy where the blood loss could not be measured by the investigator).

Table 6: Summary of Hemostatic Efficacy
Time of Hemostatic Efficacy AssessmentExcellent*GoodNumber of subjects
*
Excellent: Achieved hemostasis comparable to that expected after similar surgery in a patient without hemophilia.
Good: Prolonged time to hemostasis, with somewhat increased bleeding compared with that expected after similar surgery in a patient without hemophilia.
End of initial postoperative period is date of discharge or postoperative Day 6, whichever occurs later.
End of surgery18 (72%)7 (28%)25
End of initial postoperative period23 (92%)2 (8%)25

Routine Prophylaxis

One hundred and two (102) subjects (94 subjects ≥12 years of age and 8 subjects <12 years of age) received XYNTHA for routine prophylaxis, for comparison of annualized bleeding rate (ABR) to on-demand treatment alone as a part of 2 completed studies. XYNTHA was administered for routine prophylaxis at a dose of 25 ± 5 IU/kg every other day (in subjects <12 years of age) or 30 ± 5 IU/kg administered 3 times weekly (in subjects 12 years of age or older), with provisions for dose escalation based on pre-specified criteria (over a 4-week period, 2 spontaneous bleeds into a major joint and/or target joint, or 3 or more spontaneous bleeding episodes in any location). Among these 102 subjects, 7 dose escalations were prescribed for 6 subjects.

In subjects ≥12 years, 42 subjects (42/94 or 45%) reported no bleeding while on routine prophylaxis. The mean±SD total ABR during routine prophylaxis was 4.0±6.64 with median (min-max) of 1.9 (0.0–44.2). The mean ABR for subjects during routine prophylaxis was 88% lower than the mean ABR for subjects during on-demand treatment (Table 7).

In subjects <12 years, 4 subjects (4/8 or 50%) reported no bleeding while on routine prophylaxis. The mean±SD total ABR during routine prophylaxis was 1.5±2.2 with median (min-max) of 0.6 (0.0–6.2). The mean ABR for subjects during routine prophylaxis was 97% lower than the mean ABR for subjects during on-demand treatment (Table 7).

Table 7: Summary of Annualized Bleeding Rate During Routine Prophylaxis Treatment with XYNTHA
Age Category (years)Number of Subjects% Reduction from ODTreated Total Routine Prophylaxis ABR
Mean ± SD Median (Min-Max)
Treated Spontaneous Routine Prophylaxis ABR
Mean ± SD Median (Min-Max)
Treated Traumatic Routine Prophylaxis ABR
Mean ± SD Median (Min-Max)
OD = on demand; ABR = annualized bleeding rate; SD = standard deviation, Min = minimum, Max = maximum.
*
The treated total ABR mean ± SD during prophylaxis for the 93 subjects aged ≥12 years (outlier removed), was 3.6 ± 5.18 with median (min-max) of 1.9 (0.0–23.3). The spontaneous treated ABR mean ± SD was 1.6 ± 2.87 with median (min-max) of 0.0 (0.0–13.7). The traumatic ABR mean ± SD was 1.9 ± 3.99 with median (min-max) of 0.0 (0.0–23.3).
The treated total ABR mean ± SD during prophylaxis for the 17 adolescents (outlier removed), was 5.2 ± 6.90 with median (min-max) of 2.0 (0.0–21.4). The spontaneous ABR mean ± SD was 1.6 ± 2.94 with median (min-max) of 0.0 (0.0–11.6). The traumatic ABR mean ± SD was 3.5 ± 5.77 with median (min-max) of 1.9 (0.0–19.6).
0 to <12897%1.5 ± 2.200.6 ± 1.310.9 ± 1.30
0.6 (0.0–6.2)0.0 (0.0–3.7)0.0 (0.0–3.2)
≥1294*88%4.0 ± 6.642.0 ± 4.252.0 ± 4.10
1.9 (0.0–44.2)0.0 (0.0–32.1)0.0 (0.0–23.3)
12 to <171884%7.3 ± 11.373.3 ± 7.734.0 ± 5.94
3.0 (0.0–44.2)0.0 (0.0–32.1)1.9 (0.0–19.6)
≥177689%3.2 ± 4.701.6 ± 2.881.6 ± 3.42
1.9 (0.0–23.3)0.0 (0.0–13.7)0.0 (0.0–23.3)

Find XYNTHA® Lyophilized Powder medical information:

Find XYNTHA® Lyophilized Powder medical information:

Our scientific content is evidence-based, scientifically balanced and non-promotional. It undergoes rigorous internal medical review and is updated regularly to reflect new information.

XYNTHA® Lyophilized Powder Quick Finder

Prescribing Information
Download Prescribing Information

Health Professional Information

Clinical Studies

14 CLINICAL STUDIES

Three completed multicenter, open-label studies support the analysis of safety and efficacy of XYNTHA in on-demand treatment and control of bleeding episodes and perioperative management, and routine prophylaxis in PTPs with hemophilia A. These completed clinical studies for XYNTHA examined 174 PTP subjects, 94 from the first study, and 50 from a second study, for on-demand treatment and routine prophylaxis and 30 from a third study for surgical prophylaxis. Subjects with severe to moderately severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C ≤2%) and no history of FVIII inhibitors were eligible for the trials.

On-demand Treatment and Control of Bleeding Episodes

On-demand treatment in adolescents and adults

Ninety-four (94) subjects, 12 years of age and older received XYNTHA in a routine prophylaxis treatment regimen with on-demand treatment administered as clinically indicated. All 94 subjects were treated with at least one dose and all are included in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Eighty-nine (89) subjects accrued ≥50 EDs. Median age for the 94 treated subjects was 24 years (mean 28 and min-max: 12–60 years).

Of these 94 subjects, 30 evaluable subjects participated in a randomized crossover pharmacokinetics substudy. Twenty-five (25/30) of these subjects with FVIII:C ≤1% completed both the first (PK1) and the second (PK2) pharmacokinetic assessments [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].16

Fifty-three subjects (53/94) received XYNTHA on-demand treatment for a total of 187 bleeding episodes. Seven of these bleeding episodes occurred in subjects prior to switching to a prophylaxis treatment regimen. One hundred ten of 180 bleeds (110/180 or 61%) occurred ≤48 hours after the last dose and 39% (70/180 bleeds) occurred >48 hours after the last dose. The majority of bleeds reported to occur ≤48 hours after the last prophylaxis dose were traumatic (64/110 bleeds or 58%). Forty-two bleeds (42/70 or 60%) reported to occur >48 hours after the last prophylaxis dose were spontaneous. The on-demand treatment dosing regimen was determined by the investigator. The median dose for on-demand treatment was 31 IU/kg (min-max: 6–74 IU/kg) and the median exposure per subject was 3 days (min-max: 1–26).

The majority of bleeding episodes (173/187 or 93%) resolved with 1 or 2 infusions (Table 5). One hundred thirty-two of 187 bleeding episodes (132/187 or 71%) treated with XYNTHA were rated excellent or good in their response to initial treatment, 45 (24%) were rated moderate. Five (3%) were rated no response, and 5 (3%) were not rated.

Table 5: Summary of Response to Infusions to Treat New Bleeding Episode by Number of Infusions Needed for Resolution
Response to 1st InfusionNumber of Infusions
(%)
1
Number of Infusions
(%)
2
Number of Infusions
(%)
3
Number of Infusions
(%)
4
Number of Infusions
(%)
>4
Total Number of Bleeds
*
Excellent: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding starting within 8 hours after an infusion, with no additional infusion administered.
Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding starting within 8 hours after an infusion, with at least one additional infusion administered for complete resolution of the bleeding episode.
Moderate: Probable or slight improvement starting after 8 hours following the infusion, with at least one additional infusion administered for complete resolution of the bleeding episode.
§
No Response: No improvement at all between infusions or during the 24 hour interval following an infusion, or condition worsens.
Includes one infusion with commercial FVIII that occurred before routine prophylaxis began.
Excellent*42 (95.5)2 (4.5)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)44
Good69 (78.4)16 (18.2)3 (3.4)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)88
Moderate24 (53.3)16 (35.6)2 (4.4)0 (0.0)3 (6.7)45
No Response§0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (40.0)2 (40.0)1 (20.0)5
Not Assessed4 (80.0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (20.0)0 (0.0)5
Total139 (74.3)34 (18.2)7 (3.7)3 (1.6)4 (2.1)187

Of the 94 subjects described above, in the first completed open-label safety and efficacy study of XYNTHA, 18 were adolescent subjects 12 to <17 years of age with severe to moderately severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C ≤2%). Ten (10) of these adolescent subjects, received XYNTHA for the on-demand treatment of 66 bleeding episodes, with the majority of the bleeding episodes (63/66 or 95%) resolving with 1 or 2 infusions. The response to infusion was rated on a pre-specified 4 point hemostatic efficacy scale. Thirty-eight (38) of 66 bleeding episodes (58%) were rated excellent or good in their response to initial treatment, 24 (36%) were rated as moderate, and 4 (6%) were not rated. The median dose per on demand infusion was 47 IU/kg (min-max: 24–74).

On-demand treatment in children

Additional data for 50 subjects are available from a second safety and efficacy study of XYNTHA in children (≤12 years of age) with severe to moderately severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C ≤2%). Of the 50 subjects, 38 subjects received XYNTHA for on-demand and follow-up treatment of 562 bleeding episodes with the majority of the bleeding episodes (518/562 or 92%) resolving with 1 or 2 infusions. Of 559 bleeding episodes treated with XYNTHA with response assessments to the first infusion, 526 (94%) were rated excellent or good in their response to initial treatment and 27 (5%) were rated as moderate. The median dose per on-demand infusion was 28 IU/kg (min-max: 10–92).

Perioperative Management

In a study (n=30) for surgical prophylaxis in subjects with hemophilia A, XYNTHA was administered to 25 efficacy-evaluable PTPs undergoing major surgical procedures (11 total knee replacements, 1 hip replacement, 5 synovectomies, 1 left ulnar nerve transposition release, 1 ventral hernia repair/scar revision, 1 knee arthroscopy, 1 revision and debridement of the knee after a total knee replacement, 1 hip arthroplasty revision, 1 stapes replacement, 1 ankle arthrodesis, and 1 pseudotumor excision).17

The results of the hemostatic efficacy ratings for these subjects are presented in Table 6. Investigator's ratings of efficacy at the end of surgery and at the end of the initial postoperative period were excellent or good for all assessments. Intraoperative blood loss was reported as "normal" or "absent" for all subjects. Thirteen of the subjects (13/25 or 52%) had blood loss in the postoperative period. The postoperative blood loss was rated as "normal" for ten of these cases while three cases were rated "abnormal" (1 due to hemorrhage following surgical trauma to the epigastric artery, 1 due to an 800 mL blood loss after hip replacement surgery, and 1 after an elbow synovectomy where the blood loss could not be measured by the investigator).

Table 6: Summary of Hemostatic Efficacy
Time of Hemostatic Efficacy AssessmentExcellent*GoodNumber of subjects
*
Excellent: Achieved hemostasis comparable to that expected after similar surgery in a patient without hemophilia.
Good: Prolonged time to hemostasis, with somewhat increased bleeding compared with that expected after similar surgery in a patient without hemophilia.
End of initial postoperative period is date of discharge or postoperative Day 6, whichever occurs later.
End of surgery18 (72%)7 (28%)25
End of initial postoperative period23 (92%)2 (8%)25

Routine Prophylaxis

One hundred and two (102) subjects (94 subjects ≥12 years of age and 8 subjects <12 years of age) received XYNTHA for routine prophylaxis, for comparison of annualized bleeding rate (ABR) to on-demand treatment alone as a part of 2 completed studies. XYNTHA was administered for routine prophylaxis at a dose of 25 ± 5 IU/kg every other day (in subjects <12 years of age) or 30 ± 5 IU/kg administered 3 times weekly (in subjects 12 years of age or older), with provisions for dose escalation based on pre-specified criteria (over a 4-week period, 2 spontaneous bleeds into a major joint and/or target joint, or 3 or more spontaneous bleeding episodes in any location). Among these 102 subjects, 7 dose escalations were prescribed for 6 subjects.

In subjects ≥12 years, 42 subjects (42/94 or 45%) reported no bleeding while on routine prophylaxis. The mean±SD total ABR during routine prophylaxis was 4.0±6.64 with median (min-max) of 1.9 (0.0–44.2). The mean ABR for subjects during routine prophylaxis was 88% lower than the mean ABR for subjects during on-demand treatment (Table 7).

In subjects <12 years, 4 subjects (4/8 or 50%) reported no bleeding while on routine prophylaxis. The mean±SD total ABR during routine prophylaxis was 1.5±2.2 with median (min-max) of 0.6 (0.0–6.2). The mean ABR for subjects during routine prophylaxis was 97% lower than the mean ABR for subjects during on-demand treatment (Table 7).

Table 7: Summary of Annualized Bleeding Rate During Routine Prophylaxis Treatment with XYNTHA
Age Category (years)Number of Subjects% Reduction from ODTreated Total Routine Prophylaxis ABR
Mean ± SD Median (Min-Max)
Treated Spontaneous Routine Prophylaxis ABR
Mean ± SD Median (Min-Max)
Treated Traumatic Routine Prophylaxis ABR
Mean ± SD Median (Min-Max)
OD = on demand; ABR = annualized bleeding rate; SD = standard deviation, Min = minimum, Max = maximum.
*
The treated total ABR mean ± SD during prophylaxis for the 93 subjects aged ≥12 years (outlier removed), was 3.6 ± 5.18 with median (min-max) of 1.9 (0.0–23.3). The spontaneous treated ABR mean ± SD was 1.6 ± 2.87 with median (min-max) of 0.0 (0.0–13.7). The traumatic ABR mean ± SD was 1.9 ± 3.99 with median (min-max) of 0.0 (0.0–23.3).
The treated total ABR mean ± SD during prophylaxis for the 17 adolescents (outlier removed), was 5.2 ± 6.90 with median (min-max) of 2.0 (0.0–21.4). The spontaneous ABR mean ± SD was 1.6 ± 2.94 with median (min-max) of 0.0 (0.0–11.6). The traumatic ABR mean ± SD was 3.5 ± 5.77 with median (min-max) of 1.9 (0.0–19.6).
0 to <12897%1.5 ± 2.200.6 ± 1.310.9 ± 1.30
0.6 (0.0–6.2)0.0 (0.0–3.7)0.0 (0.0–3.2)
≥1294*88%4.0 ± 6.642.0 ± 4.252.0 ± 4.10
1.9 (0.0–44.2)0.0 (0.0–32.1)0.0 (0.0–23.3)
12 to <171884%7.3 ± 11.373.3 ± 7.734.0 ± 5.94
3.0 (0.0–44.2)0.0 (0.0–32.1)1.9 (0.0–19.6)
≥177689%3.2 ± 4.701.6 ± 2.881.6 ± 3.42
1.9 (0.0–23.3)0.0 (0.0–13.7)0.0 (0.0–23.3)
Medication Guide

Health Professional Information

{{section_name_patient}}

{{section_body_html_patient}}

Resources

Didn’t find what you were looking for? Contact us.

MI Digital Assistant

Chat online with Pfizer Medical Information regarding your inquiry on a Pfizer medicine.

Call 800-438-1985*

*Speak with a Pfizer Medical Information Professional regarding your medical inquiry. Available 9AM-5Pm ET Monday to Friday; excluding holidays.

Medical Inquiry

Submit a medical question for Pfizer prescription products.

Report Adverse Event

Pfizer Safety

To report an adverse event related to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and you are not part of a clinical trial* for this product, click the link below to submit your information:

Pfizer Safety Reporting Site

*If you are involved in a clinical trial for this product, adverse events should be reported to your coordinating study site.

If you cannot use the above website, or would like to report an adverse event related to a different Pfizer product, please call Pfizer Safety at (800) 438-1985.

FDA Medwatch

You may also contact the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) directly to report adverse events or product quality concerns either online at www.fda.gov/medwatch or call (800) 822-7967.